Pre-K program unnecessary

Commentary — By on August 16, 2010 at 9:19 am

Elizabeth Cook, research associate at the Tennessee Center for Policy Research, explains the perils of the state pre-Kindergarten program in Monday’s Tennessean.

by Elizabeth Cook

As sum­mer comes to an end, stu­dents across Ten­nessee are head­ing off to their first day of school. This year, many par­ents will be send­ing their chil­dren to pre-kindergarten for the first time, as Gov. Phil Bre­desen announced on Aug. 3 that preschool pro­grams are now avail­able — on a vol­un­tary basis — in all of Tennessee’s 95 counties.

Soon, this may also be the case nationally.

Pres­i­dent Barack Obama has pledged $10 bil­lion toward early child­hood edu­ca­tion. Many cit­i­zens con­sider uni­ver­sal pre-K a great accom­plish­ment, but Amer­i­cans should not be so quick to embrace the idea. Pre-K sim­ply does not live up to its hype and may even pro­duce harm­ful results.

This is not to argue against the well-being of Amer­i­can chil­dren, nor is it an argu­ment against pub­lic edu­ca­tion — the value of which is undeniable.

It is easy to see why, at first glance, many Amer­i­cans judge pre-K pro­grams to be wholly ben­e­fi­cial. How­ever, uni­ver­sal, insti­tu­tion­al­ized pre-K pro­grams are not the solu­tion they claim to be.

A 2010 report on Tennessee’s pre-K pro­gram, recently released by the Comptroller’s Office of Research and Edu­ca­tion Account­abil­ity, rein­forced pre­vi­ous years’ con­clu­sions: Pre-K has no long-lasting effects on stu­dent aca­d­e­mic performance.

Although pre-K seems to lead to some pos­i­tive effects on stu­dent per­for­mance in kinder­garten and first grade, this occurs, to quote the study, “pri­mar­ily among eco­nom­i­cally dis­ad­van­taged students.” Fur­ther­more, “by sec­ond grade, the dif­fer­ence between pre-K stu­dents and a rea­son­ably com­pa­ra­ble group of non-pre-K stu­dents is negligible.”

This means that after a few years of school­ing, there are no iden­ti­fi­able dif­fer­ences in aca­d­e­mic per­for­mance between stu­dents who did and did not attend pre-K. So while some argue that pre-K pro­grams offer long-term ben­e­fits to soci­ety, in real­ity the pro­gram does not offer chil­dren any sig­nif­i­cant advantage.

Not only is the pro­gram a waste of tax­payer funds, pre-K may neg­a­tively affect chil­dren who enroll. For exam­ple, a 2007 study by the National Insti­tute of Child Health and Human Devel­op­ment con­cluded that chil­dren who attended pre-K were more likely than chil­dren who did not to engage in bul­ly­ing and aggres­sion through the sixth grade. Also, will pre-K soon become manda­tory, like kindergarten?

Although atten­dance is not cur­rently oblig­a­tory, if past prece­dent tells us any­thing, it may very well soon be. As par­ents feel social pres­sure to enroll their chil­dren in these pro­grams rather than keep them at home, fam­i­lies lose the oppor­tu­nity to impart their cul­tural iden­ti­ties, val­ues and morals on their chil­dren, which could have very real consequences.

In addi­tion, tax­pay­ers, already shelling out more than $83 mil­lion a year on pre-K, will be on the hook for even more funding.

Edu­ca­tion reform should con­cen­trate on rem­e­dy­ing our nation’s fail­ing K-12 pub­lic school sys­tem, rather than expand­ing it by adding pre-K pro­grams. Uni­ver­sal pre-K merely bur­dens this already-stressed system.

Spend­ing bil­lions of tax­payer dol­lars to pro­vide stu­dents with one addi­tional year of school­ing before dump­ing them into fail­ing schools does no good at all.

Eliz­a­beth Cook is a research asso­ciate at the Ten­nessee Cen­ter for Pol­icy Research, an inde­pen­dent, non­profit and non­par­ti­san research organization.

Related posts:

  1. Less government control helps China’s economy
  2. Tennessee moves one step closer to an opportunity scholarship program
  3. Free markets can best address environmental problems
  4. Treasury Program is Destined to Fail
  5. Public-Private Investment Program will Destroy Wealth
Tags: , , ,


Comments are closed.

Switch to our mobile site