The city of Memphis has upped the ante in its vendetta against Lyft and Uber. Just last week, the city issued a cease-and-desist order to the rideshare companies. According to WREG-TV, the police department will now start sending police officers after Uber and Lyft drivers who ignore the demand. (That is, the officers who aren’t still calling in “sick” to protest proposed reductions in benefits packages, a practice that has become contagiously known as the “blue flu.”) It appears Memphis officials will do anything to protect the taxi cartel. But of course, they are doing it under the guise of safety. Think about that for a moment. If you give a free ride to a buddy, you’re in the clear. But if you charge one red cent for that ride, you’re now a criminal in the eyes of Memphis police. I fail to understand how a financial transaction turns something otherwise benign—and even encouraged by government through pro-carpooling campaigns—into criminal activity. Obviously, whether something is done for free or at a charge should be left to the market, not government, but doesn’t putting a price on something actually make it safer? If you pay for a good or service, you clearly value it more than if you receive it for free. Thus, you will take extra precautions to ensure your safety, and your expectations will be far greater if it’s costing you something in return. After all, when you get something for free, you usually get what you pay for. So not only is it constitutionally suspect and downright egregious for Memphis to turn something into a crime that would be completely acceptable if no money changed hands, it really defies logic. That’s especially true when the purported purpose is to protect the safety of citizens. But of course, the city is not interested in pubic safety as much as it is cracking down on one industry to protect another. Shame on Memphis for this disgusting display of cronyism. -Justin Owen Editor’s Note: If you are a Memphis Uber or Lyft driver and have been targeted by police, tell us your story.
KEEP IN TOUCH WITH US
LATEST POSTS
Fagerburg v. Tennessee State Board of Education et al.: Helping entrepreneurs innovate in education
Sarah is going to court to clear barriers for education entrepreneurs so that she can offer an even better education to the students she ser...
A Tale of Two Local Governments: A Property Tax Review of Davidson and Knox Counties
Opponents of a property tax cap claim it would prevent local governments from raising revenue for the most basic of services, there are loca...
Shoppers Get a Vote. Homeowners Should, Too.
If Tennessee trusts voters to decide on half a cent of sales tax, it can trust them to decide on the tax that falls on their homes, farms, a...
Addressing Demand Urgently: ADUs Are Small Homes Providing Big Solutions
Accessory dwelling units add density to already existing lots and offer a simple way to add to the housing stock. Yet many local government...
My Tennessee Home: Higher Costs and Fewer Houses
Beacon’s new brief looks at how local zoning, a multi-tiered building code landscape, and slow permit approvals are making housing more expe...
Taxing 9 to 5: What Does the Research Say About Property Tax Caps?
The bottom line is that Tennessee should join 46 other states, including all its southeastern peers, and adopt a property tax cap.
Fighting Back Against Trademark Theft: The Roberto Clemente Family v. Puerto Rico
If the government can take Roberto Clemente’s name and make $15 million off it, what stops it from doing the same with a Tennessee son...
Defending Wins and Demanding Transparency: Beacon Center of Tennessee v. Tennessee School Boards Association
This case defends a previous Beacon legal victory and reaffirms the principle of government transparency.
KEEP IN TOUCH WITH US
WANT TO DO A STORY ABOUT SOMETHING YOU SEE HERE?
CONTACT US AT:
taylor@beacontn.org
(O) 615-383-6431
WHO ARE WE?
The Beacon Center of Tennessee empowers Tennesseans to reclaim and protect their freedoms, so that they can freely pursue their version of the American Dream.