When news broke yesterday that Burger King was headed north of the border to reduce its tax liability, many people lost their minds. Facebook commenters took to Burger King’s page and hurled epithets like “traitor,” “un-American,” and “tax cheat” at the burger joint. Americans have a right to be upset that an iconic brand is fleeing for Canada, but they’re pointing their finger in the wrong direction. The only reason Burger King is heading north is our prohibitive corporate tax rate, which is the highest effective corporate tax rate in the world. At nearly 40 percent, our corporate tax rate is some 15 points higher than the average nation’s. It’s important to remember that corporations don’t pay taxes. It’s not as if Burger King’s creepy faux king mascot foots the corporation’s tax bill. People do. Burger King’s workers pay it through lower wages, shareholders pay it through lower payouts on their investments, and consumers pay it through higher burger prices. Burger King’s attempt to reduce its tax burden will only mean it can pass on higher wages to workers, higher earnings to investors, and cheaper burgers to the rest of us. Burger King is simply making a prudent business decision. If Americans are up in arms about the restaurant’s relocation, they should call their congressman and demand that we fix our tax code, starting with the corporate tax. Get rid of all the loopholes that favor some business over others, and lower the overall rate for all businesses—from the mom and pop shop to the Burger King’s of the world. That’s the “American” solution to this whole affair. – Justin Owen
KEEP IN TOUCH WITH US
LATEST POSTS
Fagerburg v. Tennessee State Board of Education et al.: Helping entrepreneurs innovate in education
Sarah is going to court to clear barriers for education entrepreneurs so that she can offer an even better education to the students she ser...
A Tale of Two Local Governments: A Property Tax Review of Davidson and Knox Counties
Opponents of a property tax cap claim it would prevent local governments from raising revenue for the most basic of services, there are loca...
Shoppers Get a Vote. Homeowners Should, Too.
If Tennessee trusts voters to decide on half a cent of sales tax, it can trust them to decide on the tax that falls on their homes, farms, a...
Addressing Demand Urgently: ADUs Are Small Homes Providing Big Solutions
Accessory dwelling units add density to already existing lots and offer a simple way to add to the housing stock. Yet many local government...
My Tennessee Home: Higher Costs and Fewer Houses
Beacon’s new brief looks at how local zoning, a multi-tiered building code landscape, and slow permit approvals are making housing more expe...
Taxing 9 to 5: What Does the Research Say About Property Tax Caps?
The bottom line is that Tennessee should join 46 other states, including all its southeastern peers, and adopt a property tax cap.
Fighting Back Against Trademark Theft: The Roberto Clemente Family v. Puerto Rico
If the government can take Roberto Clemente’s name and make $15 million off it, what stops it from doing the same with a Tennessee son...
Defending Wins and Demanding Transparency: Beacon Center of Tennessee v. Tennessee School Boards Association
This case defends a previous Beacon legal victory and reaffirms the principle of government transparency.
KEEP IN TOUCH WITH US
WANT TO DO A STORY ABOUT SOMETHING YOU SEE HERE?
CONTACT US AT:
taylor@beacontn.org
(O) 615-383-6431
WHO ARE WE?
The Beacon Center of Tennessee empowers Tennesseans to reclaim and protect their freedoms, so that they can freely pursue their version of the American Dream.