Gibson Guitar has been crafting beautiful guitars for nearly a century, all the while contributing to America’s storied music history, employing hundreds of people, and doing it all within the letter of the law. How does our government treat such an iconic symbol of American pride? By raiding its plant at gunpoint, that’s how. Two years ago, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service descended on Gibson’s Nashville factory, leading many to believe the company was raping some far-off exotic trees in violation of numerous federal and international laws. But Gibson CEO Henry Juszkiewicz revealed in a recent Forbes interview that the true motive for the raid was far more sinister. “…Gibson’s very success made it a fat target for federal prosecutors, whom Juszkiewicz alleges were operating at the behest of lumber unions and environmental pressure groups seeking to kill the market for lumber imports. ‘This case was not about conservation,’ he says. ‘It was basically protectionism.’” Gibson’s alleged violation? Importing illegal fingerboards—not outlawed because they were carved from endangered exotic trees, but because they were four millimeters too thick, the length of a common black ant. The law in question was the Lacey Act, and the offending provision was added to the law just two months before the raid on the guitar maker. Had Gibson employed unionized Indian workers to shave down the fingerboards rather than doing it in their own nonunion plant, the raid might never have happened. Protectionism indeed. And as the Forbes article points out, this is nothing unique. “Just ask Harvey Silverglate, Boston lawyer, activist, civil liberties advocate, and author of Three Felonies a Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent. As he explains, the Feds routinely take advantage of the vagueness of many of our laws by starting from the target and working backwards, selectively prosecuting people they want to go after by charging them with crimes they often don’t even know exist.” Until we return our nation to the rule of law where all Americans are treated equally and are no longer subject to the whim of overzealous prosecutors and their protectionist cheerleaders, no one is safe. Not even beloved companies like Gibson can come out ahead without paying massively. Even though the company was never charged and has never been allowed to view the sealed warrant authorizing the raid, it had to fork over a $250,000 fine, a $50,000 donation to an environmental group, and had substantial business disruption costs, let alone its reputation impugned in the process. At least Mr. Juszkiewicz is willing to stand up for what is right—unlike the feds and the unions that tried to take him out. -Justin Owen Enjoy the Beacon blog? Help us keep it going with a tax-deductible gift.
KEEP IN TOUCH WITH US
LATEST POSTS
Fagerburg v. Tennessee State Board of Education et al.: Helping entrepreneurs innovate in education
Sarah is going to court to clear barriers for education entrepreneurs so that she can offer an even better education to the students she ser...
A Tale of Two Local Governments: A Property Tax Review of Davidson and Knox Counties
Opponents of a property tax cap claim it would prevent local governments from raising revenue for the most basic of services, there are loca...
Shoppers Get a Vote. Homeowners Should, Too.
If Tennessee trusts voters to decide on half a cent of sales tax, it can trust them to decide on the tax that falls on their homes, farms, a...
Addressing Demand Urgently: ADUs Are Small Homes Providing Big Solutions
Accessory dwelling units add density to already existing lots and offer a simple way to add to the housing stock. Yet many local government...
My Tennessee Home: Higher Costs and Fewer Houses
Beacon’s new brief looks at how local zoning, a multi-tiered building code landscape, and slow permit approvals are making housing more expe...
Taxing 9 to 5: What Does the Research Say About Property Tax Caps?
The bottom line is that Tennessee should join 46 other states, including all its southeastern peers, and adopt a property tax cap.
Fighting Back Against Trademark Theft: The Roberto Clemente Family v. Puerto Rico
If the government can take Roberto Clemente’s name and make $15 million off it, what stops it from doing the same with a Tennessee son...
Defending Wins and Demanding Transparency: Beacon Center of Tennessee v. Tennessee School Boards Association
This case defends a previous Beacon legal victory and reaffirms the principle of government transparency.
KEEP IN TOUCH WITH US
WANT TO DO A STORY ABOUT SOMETHING YOU SEE HERE?
CONTACT US AT:
taylor@beacontn.org
(O) 615-383-6431
WHO ARE WE?
The Beacon Center of Tennessee empowers Tennesseans to reclaim and protect their freedoms, so that they can freely pursue their version of the American Dream.