Gibson Guitar has been crafting beautiful guitars for nearly a century, all the while contributing to America’s storied music history, employing hundreds of people, and doing it all within the letter of the law. How does our government treat such an iconic symbol of American pride? By raiding its plant at gunpoint, that’s how. Two years ago, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service descended on Gibson’s Nashville factory, leading many to believe the company was raping some far-off exotic trees in violation of numerous federal and international laws. But Gibson CEO Henry Juszkiewicz revealed in a recent Forbes interview that the true motive for the raid was far more sinister. “…Gibson’s very success made it a fat target for federal prosecutors, whom Juszkiewicz alleges were operating at the behest of lumber unions and environmental pressure groups seeking to kill the market for lumber imports. ‘This case was not about conservation,’ he says. ‘It was basically protectionism.’” Gibson’s alleged violation? Importing illegal fingerboards—not outlawed because they were carved from endangered exotic trees, but because they were four millimeters too thick, the length of a common black ant. The law in question was the Lacey Act, and the offending provision was added to the law just two months before the raid on the guitar maker. Had Gibson employed unionized Indian workers to shave down the fingerboards rather than doing it in their own nonunion plant, the raid might never have happened. Protectionism indeed. And as the Forbes article points out, this is nothing unique. “Just ask Harvey Silverglate, Boston lawyer, activist, civil liberties advocate, and author of Three Felonies a Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent. As he explains, the Feds routinely take advantage of the vagueness of many of our laws by starting from the target and working backwards, selectively prosecuting people they want to go after by charging them with crimes they often don’t even know exist.” Until we return our nation to the rule of law where all Americans are treated equally and are no longer subject to the whim of overzealous prosecutors and their protectionist cheerleaders, no one is safe. Not even beloved companies like Gibson can come out ahead without paying massively. Even though the company was never charged and has never been allowed to view the sealed warrant authorizing the raid, it had to fork over a $250,000 fine, a $50,000 donation to an environmental group, and had substantial business disruption costs, let alone its reputation impugned in the process. At least Mr. Juszkiewicz is willing to stand up for what is right—unlike the feds and the unions that tried to take him out. -Justin Owen Enjoy the Beacon blog? Help us keep it going with a tax-deductible gift.
KEEP IN TOUCH WITH US
LATEST POSTS
Bethlehem Manor LLC v. City of Bethlehem: Fighting back against immunity for arbitrary zoning decisions at the Supreme Court
Beacon is fighting back against immunity for arbitrary zoning decisions at the Supreme Court.
Energy Reliability is Only as Strong as its Weakest Wire
The Volunteer State is building a serious energy future that will continue to anchor our leadership in the sector. Allowing competition and...
ExoticRidge v. Hawkins County: Fighting back against an arbitrary data center ban in East Tennessee
Executive Summary Technology is evolving like never before. Americans today benefit from rapid advancements in fields like artificial intell...
Liberating the Legal System: Beacon Urges Better Access to Justice
Tennessee has a choice: maintain outdated rules that restrict opportunity and choice or embrace reforms that respect individual rights, enco...
Nashville Home-based Business Owners Cement Victory Over Customer Restrictions
"This awesome victory will help music made by people, together, in Music City, keeping creativity alive.”
The Data Center Panic Isn’t Backed by Data
Data centers may not be the typical industrial building, like a Nissan, General Motors, or Volkswagen plant, yet they are less of a boogey m...
Fact or Cap? Property Tax Caps in Tennessee
With so much media coverage and discussion around a property tax cap, what is the reality of such a policy, and is one needed in Tennessee?
Why Tennessee Doesn’t Need a State Property Tax
We’ve made it just fine for more than 75 years without a state property tax, and we’ll be just fine in the future without one.
KEEP IN TOUCH WITH US
WANT TO DO A STORY ABOUT SOMETHING YOU SEE HERE?
CONTACT US AT:
taylor@beacontn.org
(O) 615-383-6431
WHO ARE WE?
The Beacon Center of Tennessee empowers Tennesseans to reclaim and protect their freedoms, so that they can freely pursue their version of the American Dream.